So What Club
Start free

Frameworks, and why we do not teach them

Pricing lenses: what it is and what to do instead

Cost, competitors and value: the value maths for this customer is what sets the price.

Facts checked against sources on

What is Pricing lenses?

The three pricing lenses look at price from three sides: cost sets the floor, the value to the customer sets the ceiling, and competitor prices show where in that range you can land.

The idea worth keeping

Not as boxes to fill, but as questions that fall out of the maths of the goal:

  • What is the product worth to this customer, in money, per year?
  • What is the cheapest alternative, and what does it fail to do?
  • How does this customer approve a purchase (for example, a payback rule)?

Why reaching for it fails in an interview

  • It is generic. Cost, competitors and value can be said about any product.
  • It misses the driver that matters. For a new industrial sensor, the price is set by the cost of the failures it prevents, which is far above both cost and rival prices.
  • It sounds rehearsed. Listing three lenses without doing the value maths sounds like a list.

What to do instead: a worked case

Pricing a sensor that predicts machine failures

A maker of industrial sensors has built one that predicts machine failures before they happen. What should it charge?

The tempting answer: Cost-based, competitor-based and value-based pricing, each described.

  1. Pin the question

    Set a yearly price per machine that factories will approve quickly and that captures a fair share of the value.

  2. Write the maths of the goal

    • Value to the customer per machine per year = failures avoided x cost of one failure
    • Customer payback = price / value per year
  3. Use what you know about the business

    • An unplanned stop costs a factory lost output and repair, which is often far more than the sensor.
    • Plant managers often approve spending that pays back within a year without a long process.
    • Buyers trust savings they have seen, so a pilot on a few machines helps sell the price.

    The structure that falls out of it

    • Value to the customer
      • Failures per machine per year
      • Cost of one failure
      • Share the sensor prevents
    • Floor
      • Our cost to make and support one sensor per year
    • How they buy
      • Payback rule
      • Cheapest alternative

    Hypothesis: The value to the customer is far above our cost and the basic rival, so we can price well above both and still pay back fast.

  4. Find the facts that decide it

    • A machine fails twice a year; each failure costs 40,000. The sensor prevents half, so it saves 40,000 a year per machine.
    • Our cost is 3,000 a year per machine; a basic sensor that only monitors sells for 2,000. At 12,000 a year, the customer pays back in 12,000 / 40,000 = 0.3 of a year, about 4 months, and keeps 28,000 of the saving.
  5. Say so what

    Charge about 12,000 per machine per year: the customer saves 40,000, pays back in about 4 months and keeps 28,000, while we earn 9,000 over our cost. Start with paid pilots on a few machines to prove the savings. The risk is that failures cost less in some plants, so offer a lower price for less critical machines.

Why this beats Pricing lenses: The value maths supports a price four times our cost, and knowing how factories approve spending makes it sellable.

Build the acumen behind it

The worked case used two things a list cannot give you: the five moves, and knowing how this kind of business makes money. These pages teach both.

Learn it in context

See the idea behind Pricing lenses at work in a lesson from Why some businesses win: competitive advantage and the economics of strategy, built from the question rather than a list.

Spotted something wrong or out of date? Report a mistake. We check every report and correct the page.